By Moses Wawah Onapa
I have on a numerous occasions read the Supreme Book of Land and one confusing element is that it tries to portray a Uganda that started in 1986 and it is commonly called the fundamental change era. In fact, in front of the parliamentary building on January 29, 1986; The president announced that the change arrived at was not just a change of guards but a total fundamental change. A handful of heroes were later named in the constitution promulgated on October 8, 1995, shunning away all the little or less contributions (according to them) of the past leaders
Today, I decided to go bare knuckles and shed good light and erase the misinformation that made the young ones naïve and ignorant about the country’s future and past glory. The claims of a revolution and good governance starting in 1986 is a total fallacy and misrepresentation of facts.
These claims of revolution are totally false. No revolution occurred in Uganda in 1986. To understand the current government’s claims to have brought about a fundamental change or a Cuban-type of revolution in Uganda, we need to take a brief look at the writings of Regis Debray. This is because the writings of Regis Debray constituted the theoretical guide for these people in their struggles.
Who was Regis Debray in the first place?
Regis Debray was a French philosopher who went to teach Philosophy at the University of Havana soon after the Cuban revolution. While there he got very close to Fidel Castro and Che Guevara. Regis Debray eventually left Cuba with Che. He was arrested in the small Bolivian town in April 1967 and Che was killed the following October. For associating with Che, Regis was given a savage sentence of 30 years in prison which was terminated when various world leaders appealed for him. He had served four years of his sentence.
Regis Debray wrote a number of books and essays about the Cuban revolution. His most famous piece of writing is the “Revolution in the Revolution?” published in 1967 and which acted as the 1986 group’s bible. A number of his essays also appeared in book form under the title, “Strategy of Revolution”, published in 1970. The problem is that Regis Debray’s interpretation of the Cuban revolution was faulty.
He totally ignored the part of the work that had been done to prepare the situation for revolution as the 1986 group thinks before they(Cubans’) attack on the Moncada barracks. He was also of the mistaken view that the small group of people led by Castro were the ones who got the people to rise up against Batista.
This is what encouraged the 1986 group to believe that all they had to do is raise that small group of people and the people will rise up. Contrary to what Regis Debray thought, the work to bring the people to the level of political consciousness they embraced at the time Fidel Castro and his comrades intervened took 100 years.
This is why I believe that I shall be stupid to believe that there was a fundamental change in Uganda in 1986 but also on the other hand believe that the current president still has a long way to create more paths through which a fundamental change can be realized. If he has prepared the son for continuity of this fundamental change, anything is welcome but first things first, correct the history by erasing the names of non-Ugandans in the constitution of this great pearl of Africa and replace it with true road map to the eventful fundamental change. Why place only the 27 as heroes of Uganda and we continue to shun down the forefathers who shed blood for an independent Uganda?
Carlo M. Cipolla writes in the great write-up particularly, the first basic law of human stupidity that asserts without ambiguity that: Always and inevitably everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.
At first, the statement sounds trivial, vague and horribly ungenerous. Closer scrutiny will however reveal its realistic veracity. No matter how high are one’s estimates of human stupidity, one is repeatedly and recurrently startled by the fact that anyone can be made to believe that they are ignorant.
In the current state of the country, I feel offended to portray Uganda as if it has just started in 1986 while deceitfully celebrating Uganda’s 61st Anniversary.
We might be stupid but it’s the right time that history is corrected for the future generation to enjoy authenticated and correct write-ups.
For God and my country
Moses Wawah Onapa is an educationist, mentor and social commentator | Email: [email protected]
Do you have a story or an opinion to share? Email us on: [email protected] Or join the Daily Express WhatsApp channel for all the latest news and trends or join the Telegram Channel for the latest updates.
