The Stale Status Quo: Uganda’s reliance on ageing leaders

By Gumisiriza Gerald

As Uganda witnesses yet another round of appointments in key government positions, the glaring trend of favouring ageing individuals over younger, dynamic talent persists. The recent appointment of Dr Johnson Rwashote Byabasheija as commissioner General of Prisons exemplifies this entrenched practice, where the same faces resurface despite the call for rejuvenation and inclusivity in leadership.

This pattern not only stifles progress but also undermines the aspirations of millions of young Ugandans who were once promised the mantle of leadership.

The appointment of Dr Rwashote Byabashaija, who has held the position multiple times, raises questions about the government’s commitment to fostering innovation and fresh perspectives within the public sector.

With around 46 million Ugandans looking towards a promising future, the insistence on recycling aged leaders sends a disheartening message – one that suggests their voices and potential contributions are overlooked in favor of the status quo.

The rhetoric of ‘tomorrow’s leaders’ loses its meaning when tomorrow never seems to arrive. When is tomorrow? It remains an elusive concept, perpetually deferred as the same cohort of leaders clings to power, denying opportunities for the younger generation to step forward and lead. The promise of tomorrow becomes hollow when today’s decisions perpetuate the same cycle of stagnation.

Moreover, the issue extends beyond the appointment of individuals like Dr Rwashote Byabasheija. It permeates through various layers of government, where civil servants cling to their positions for years, impeding the infusion of new ideas and energy.

While experience is valuable, it should not come at the cost of excluding younger voices eager to contribute and innovate. The reluctance to retire or make way for fresh talent not only hampers efficiency but also perpetuates a culture of complacency.

The recently reshuffled cabinet reflects this concerning trend, with the reappointment of familiar faces raising doubts about the government’s commitment to embracing change. While continuity is important, it should not come at the expense of diversity and inclusivity.

A balanced blend of experience and innovation is essential for addressing the evolving challenges facing Uganda and harnessing the full potential of its citizens.

It is time for Uganda to break free from the shackles of tradition and embrace a more inclusive approach to governance. This entails not only appointing leaders based on merit and potential but also fostering an environment where age is not a barrier to entry or advancement. Empowering the younger generation to take on leadership roles is not only a matter of fairness but also a strategic imperative for ensuring a prosperous and sustainable future.

In conclusion, the repeated appointment of ageing leaders in government, exemplified by figures like Byabasheija, undermines the aspirations of Uganda’s youth and perpetuates a cycle of stagnation. It is imperative for the government to prioritize inclusivity, diversity, and meritocracy in its leadership appointments to unlock the full potential of the nation.

Only then can Uganda truly fulfil the promise of tomorrow’s leaders.

The author is a teacher & a student at Makerere University