By Wejuli Junior Mike
Uganda, like many low- and middle-income countries, faces the dual challenge of a high disease burden and limited health care resources. As the country strives toward the goal of Universal Health Coverage, aimed at ensuring that all individuals and communities receive the health services they need without suffering financial hardship, the need to optimize resource use becomes paramount.
One of the most promising strategies in this context is health care service integration. By breaking down the silos that separate services and programs, health care service integration offers a path toward a more efficient, equitable, and resilient health system capable of achieving UHC, even amidst financial constraints.
Following the cross-programmatic efficiency analysis, health integration stands out as a measure of leveraging existing health system challenges by focusing on a patient holistically. Health care service integration refers to the deliberate coordination and delivery of a range of health services across various levels of care and health system actors. It involves combining preventive, promotive, curative, rehabilitative, and palliative services into a unified delivery framework.
This approach contrasts with the traditional vertical programming model, where services are offered in isolated packages, often driven by disease-specific funding and donor agendas. Integration may occur at different levels, including at the point of service delivery, for example, combining family planning and HIV testing during antenatal care, through integrated management protocols (such as the Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses), or via cross-sectoral collaboration (such as health and nutrition linkages).
The case for integration in Uganda is compelling. Over the years, the country has made substantial health gains through vertical programs targeting diseases such as HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis. However, these gains have come with significant inefficiencies. Multiple parallel systems for procurement, data reporting, staffing, and supervision have led to duplication, wastage of resources, and a fragmented patient experience.
In a context where government funding for health remains low, hovering around 6-9% of total public expenditure and far below the Abuja Declaration target of 15%, there is a critical need to do more with less. Integration allows for the rational use of infrastructure, human resources, and commodities, thereby improving efficiency across the system.
Moreover, integration enhances access to care and improves quality. In many rural areas of Uganda, patients travel long distances to health facilities. Offering integrated services means that a patient can receive multiple services e.g. such as immunization, nutrition counselling, HIV testing, and malaria prevention, in a single visit.
This approach reduces missed opportunities for care and strengthens health outcomes through early diagnosis and timely treatment. It is particularly beneficial for maternal and child health, where integrating services such as antenatal care, family planning, HIV prevention, and postnatal care can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality.
Health care service integration also contributes to system-wide resilience. A well-integrated health system is better positioned to respond to public health emergencies without compromising routine services. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, many countries that had integrated community health systems were able to adapt quickly, continuing essential services while managing the outbreak.
For Uganda, which is vulnerable to disease outbreaks such as Ebola and cholera, strengthening integration can help build a robust and responsive health infrastructure.
Additionally, integration supports Uganda’s vision of equity and inclusive health. By minimizing access barriers, particularly for marginalized populations such as refugees, persons with disabilities, and the urban poor, integrated services promote fairness in health outcomes.
It ensures that all people, regardless of socioeconomic status or location, have access to a basic package of services that address their most pressing health needs. This is a critical pillar of UHC and aligns with the broader goals of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Goal 3, of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all.
From a financial standpoint, integration enhances the efficiency of health financing mechanisms. Pooling resources from government, donors, and development partners under common frameworks such as sector-wide approaches reduces financial fragmentation and allows for more strategic purchasing of services.
This is particularly important as Uganda prepares to implement its National Health Insurance Scheme. Integrated service delivery ensures that insurance packages are comprehensive, reduces administrative overhead, and improves value for money.
Nonetheless, the path to integration is not without challenges. Uganda continues to grapple with an under-resourced and overburdened health workforce. Many health workers lack the training and tools needed to deliver a broad package of services. Information systems are often incompatible across programs, limiting the ability to track patient outcomes holistically.
Furthermore, entrenched interests and donor preferences for vertical programs can pose resistance to systemic integration. Addressing these barriers requires strong leadership, capacity building, health worker incentives, and policy alignment among stakeholders.
Therefore, integration is a paradigm shift in how health care is delivered, financed, and governed. For Uganda, it represents a strategic and cost-effective approach to overcoming resource limitations, strengthening health systems, and advancing toward UHC.
If you would like your article/opinion to be published on Uganda’s most authoritative news platform, send your submission on: [email protected]. You can also follow DailyExpress on WhatsApp and on Twitter (X) for realtime updates.
