By I. Samuel Kizito
Uganda is becoming digital at a speed few of us pause to reflect on. Every day, millions of Ugandans rely on smartphones, mobile money, biometric national IDs, hospital information systems, online banking platforms and government digital services. From health facilities to schools, NGOs to local businesses, technology is now deeply woven into daily life.
Yet as the country accelerates its digital transformation, one critical question remains largely unanswered: How safe are we in this digital world?
Cybersecurity is often misunderstood as an issue reserved for computer experts or large corporations in wealthy countries. In reality, it affects everyone. At its core, cybersecurity is about protecting digital systems, devices and information from theft, misuse, manipulation or disruption. When cybersecurity fails, the consequences are not abstract or theoretical. They are personal, social and national.
Many Ugandans believe cybercrime mainly targets big banks and multinational companies abroad. The truth is quite the opposite. Countries with weaker systems, limited awareness and inconsistent enforcement are often easier targets. Cyber attackers do not only pursue wealth; they pursue vulnerability.
As Uganda expands digital systems across healthcare, finance, education and governance, it also expands the number of digital entry points that can be exploited. Too many of these entry points remain poorly protected.
Healthcare: When Cybersecurity Becomes a Human Issue
Nowhere is this more evident than in healthcare. Across Uganda, hospitals and clinics are adopting electronic medical records, laboratory information systems and digital reporting platforms. These systems store extremely sensitive information such as HIV status, mental health history, national ID numbers, phone contacts and physical addresses.
When such systems lack strong security, that information can be exposed, altered or sold. A breach in a health system is not just an IT failure. It can lead to stigma, discrimination, identity theft and loss of trust in health services.
In many developed countries, cybersecurity in healthcare is treated as a patient safety issue. In Uganda, it is still too often treated as an optional technical upgrade—or ignored altogether.
Everyday Threats, National Consequences
Cyber threats Ugandans face daily rarely look dramatic. They come disguised as WhatsApp messages asking for urgent help, phone calls pretending to be from telecom companies, links promising jobs or loans, or emails demanding immediate action.
In offices, staff share passwords, use personal email accounts for official work, delay system updates or ignore security warnings they do not understand. Individually, these actions may seem harmless. Collectively, they create serious national vulnerabilities.
Cybersecurity does not fail only because of sophisticated hackers; it more often breaks down due to small, repeated human errors.
If you remember nothing else from this piece, remember this:
“The weakest link in any cyber system—whether strong or weak—is the human being.”
Yes, that means me and you.
Elections and the Cybersecurity Question
The recent Ugandan general elections provided another important reminder of why cybersecurity matters. During the presidential election, Biometric Voter Verification Kits (BVVKs) experienced widespread failures, while similar technology reportedly functioned more smoothly during mayoral elections.
Regardless of political interpretation, this episode raises critical technical and cybersecurity questions that deserve calm, informed discussion.
From a technical standpoint, biometric systems are designed to verify identity—not to interact with the voting choice itself. In a secure electoral process, voter identification and vote casting must remain strictly separate.
However, when a system verifies a voter and also digitally tracks or logs ballot issuance or scanning processes, there is a potential risk—if systems are poorly designed or audited—of creating data trails that could theoretically be correlated after the fact.
Such correlation would not require real-time tracking to be harmful. Even the possibility that system logs, timestamps, device identifiers or ballot records could be cross-referenced during audits can undermine confidence in the secrecy of the vote.
Protecting the secret ballot is not only a legal requirement; it is a cybersecurity and trust issue.
From another angle, the reported failure of BVVKs during the presidential election may itself point to risk-mitigation decisions. Systems may be deliberately limited, disabled or operated in constrained modes to prevent the possibility—real or perceived—of linking voter identity to vote choice.
Whether or not this was the case, the broader lesson remains: election technology must be designed, audited and communicated transparently, with cybersecurity and privacy protections clearly understood by both officials and the public.
Globally, election technology failures are rarely caused by hacking alone. They more often result from inadequate training, rushed deployment, poor system design and insufficient security planning. Uganda is not unique in this challenge. But without strong cybersecurity governance, such incidents risk eroding public trust in democratic processes.
Cybersecurity Is Not Just About Technology
One of the biggest misconceptions is that cybersecurity is primarily a technical problem. Technology matters—but people matter more.
Most cyber incidents occur because someone clicks a malicious link, shares a password, ignores a warning or fails to report suspicious activity. Without digital awareness and responsibility, even the most advanced systems will fail.
Again, if you remember nothing else from this piece, remember this:
“The weakest link in any cyber system—whether strong or weak—is the human being.”
Ordinary citizens also have a role to play. Simple actions—locking phones, using strong and unique passwords, being cautious with messages and links, and protecting personal information—can significantly reduce risk. Reporting cybercrime rather than remaining silent helps authorities understand and address threats more effectively.
Leadership, Investment and the Road Ahead
Government and institutions must lead by example. Cybersecurity should be built into national systems from the beginning—not added after damage has occurred.
Health systems, electoral platforms, financial services and government databases must be secured by design. Regular staff training, enforcement of data protection laws, sustained investment and the inclusion of cybersecurity education in schools and universities are no longer optional.
Uganda’s future is undeniably digital. Our healthcare system, economy, elections and governance increasingly depend on technology. But a digital future without security is a fragile one. Without trust, digital systems cannot serve the people they are meant to help.
Cybersecurity is not a luxury for wealthy nations. It is a foundation for development, dignity and democratic stability. If Uganda is to benefit fully from digital transformation, we must stop reacting only after harm occurs and start protecting ourselves before it happens.
Taking cybersecurity seriously today is an investment in a safer, more resilient Uganda tomorrow.
The author is an IT professional with extensive experience in EMR system development, IT systems auditing, healthcare technology support and digital systems management.
If you would like your article/opinion to be published on Uganda’s most authoritative news platform, send your submission on: [email protected]. You can also follow DailyExpress on WhatsApp and on Twitter (X) for realtime updates.
