By Atwikirize Barnabas
Uganda’s fight against corruption must go beyond arrests, public statements and promises of accountability. It must confront the financial systems through which illicit wealth is accumulated, concealed and introduced into the legitimate economy. The Inspectorate of Government’s FY2024/25 Annual Abstract estimates that corruption costs Uganda approximately Shs10 trillion annually. This represents an enormous economic burden in a country where millions of citizens continue to grapple with unemployment, rising living costs and inadequate public services.
Transparency International’s 2024 Corruption Perceptions Index scored Uganda 25 out of 100, ranking it 140th among 180 countries. The consequences of corruption, however, extend far beyond international rankings and statistics. The diversion of iron sheets intended for vulnerable communities in Karamoja, which triggered parliamentary investigations and recommendations for prosecution in 2023, illustrates how corruption can deprive disadvantaged communities of resources meant to improve their welfare.
At the same time, the concentration of illicit wealth among a privileged minority undermines fair competition, widens economic disparities and erodes public confidence in government institutions. The World Bank’s October 2024 Poverty and Equity Brief estimated Uganda’s poverty rate at 30.1 per cent under its revised national poverty line, underscoring the scale of the country’s socioeconomic challenges.
Against this background, Uganda must seriously examine innovative approaches to tackling unexplained wealth, including the possibility of introducing carefully designed currency-validity measures.
Could the Bank of Uganda periodically replace currency notes or introduce carefully regulated expiry dates to discourage the concealment and circulation of illicit wealth?
The idea deserves public debate. An individual holding billions of shillings accumulated through corruption should not find it easy to introduce such wealth into the legitimate economy without scrutiny. Periodic currency replacement, if properly designed and supported by effective financial intelligence systems, could create opportunities to identify suspicious cash holdings and investigate unexplained wealth.
However, compulsory expiry dates on all banknotes would carry significant risks. Ordinary Ugandans, particularly those in rural communities who depend heavily on cash transactions, could be unfairly disadvantaged. People who keep legitimate savings outside the formal banking system should not be punished because of the misconduct of corrupt individuals. Any currency-validity policy must therefore protect legitimate savings, provide adequate notice and allow accessible procedures for exchanging genuine currency.
More importantly, currency replacement alone cannot eliminate corruption or money laundering. The more sustainable solution lies in strengthening Uganda’s financial accountability, intelligence and asset-recovery systems.
The Bank of Uganda, Financial Intelligence Authority, Uganda Revenue Authority and Inspectorate of Government should strengthen cooperation in tracking suspicious transactions, identifying unexplained wealth and tracing the beneficial ownership of properties, businesses and other assets. Public officials should be subjected to independently verifiable asset declarations, with lifestyle audits conducted where credible evidence suggests that their wealth is inconsistent with their legitimate income.
Government procurement and public expenditure must also become increasingly digitised, transparent and traceable. Every public transaction should leave an auditable trail that makes it difficult to divert public resources without detection.
Furthermore, money and assets recovered from corruption and money laundering should be preserved throughout investigations and, following appropriate court orders, confiscated and channelled into legally authorised public purposes. Rather than allowing recovered wealth to disappear into bureaucratic processes, Uganda should ensure that it ultimately benefits the citizens from whom it was taken.
Periodic currency redesigns may also be considered where justified by monetary policy and financial security objectives, but they should not become a substitute for effective investigations, prosecution and asset recovery. The priority must be to make illicit wealth difficult to conceal, transfer and enjoy.
Ultimately, Uganda cannot build an inclusive economy while corruption continues to reward a privileged few at the expense of the majority. Every shilling stolen from public coffers represents a missed opportunity to equip a hospital, construct a classroom, improve a road or support a struggling household.
The objective must therefore go beyond fighting dirty money. It must be about restoring economic fairness, reducing unjustified wealth concentration and ensuring that national resources create opportunities for ordinary Ugandans.
The time has come to make corruption financially unrewarding and public accountability economically indispensable.
Atwikirize Barnabas
Email: [email protected]
If you would like your article/opinion to be published on Uganda’s most authoritative news platform, send your submission on: [email protected]. You can also follow DailyExpress on WhatsApp and on Twitter (X) for realtime updates.
